dahill d'onofrio stratford ct

No votes were taken. 93, 787 A.2d 32 (2001). Hardiman and Cray would have testified to a loan from D'Onofrio at 4% interest per week; Francis Curcio discussed the loan with Cray and when Hardiman left town before repaying the debt, Gus Curcio told Cray that he was "hunting for" Hardiman. "aQ\]_}Doendstream WebPersons with name DAHILL DONOFRIO DAHILL DONOFRIO - Principal. (b) In any prosecution under this section, if it is shown that all of the following factors were present in connection with the extension of credit in question, there is prima facie evidence that the extension of credit was extortionate, but this subsection is nonexclusive and in no way limits the effect or applicability of subsection (a): (1) The repayment of the extension of credit, or the performance of any promise given in consideration thereof, would be unenforceable, through civil judicial processes against the debtor, (A) in the jurisdiction within which the debtor, if a natural person, resides or, (B) in every jurisdiction within which the debtor, if other than a natural person, was incorporated or qualified to do business. [Part C, Motion of Defendants Gus Curcio and Francis Curcio to Dismiss the Indictment, dated July 14, 1982. Later it sentenced them, increasing the sentences of Francis and Gus Curcio from the six years recommended by the Government to nine and eight years respectively and of Garcia from one to two years, and decreasing the sentence of D'Onofrio from the four years recommended by the Government to three. It seems that JavaScript is not working in your browser. Jacob D. Zeldes, Bridgeport, Conn. (Miriam Berkman, and Zeldes, Needle & Cooper, Bridgeport, Conn.), for appellants Francis Curcio and Gus Curcio. 570, 576-77, 989 A.2d 606, cert. Once the question of subject matter jurisdiction has been raised cognizance of it must be taken and the matter passed upon before [the court] can move one further step in the cause; as any movement is necessarily the exercise of jurisdiction. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Additionally, the defendant Connecticut Environmental Control, LLC, is a party to this action by virtue of a contractor's lien recorded on the Stratford land records on May 31, 2007..FN1. m(%RS+Tu-e8LPuW-s?psgkT&ouHe^fkgGE;Z31Sr]-1* Dahill Donofrio in CT - Address & Phone Number The substitute plaintiff, the Bank of New York, as Trustee for TBW Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-1 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-1 (the Bank), now moves for summary judgment as to liability against the defendant 4 Whip, LLC (4 Whip). YvXP+U$Y$iqAn2e^M?iB,'_:8*5]C0uQn7msIa1m You're all set! Specifically, 4 Whip alleges: (1) failure to comply with the provisions of the note and deed; (2) failure to comply with mandatory conditions precedent to the acceleration of the loan and commencement of suit; (3) failure to provide the requisite notice pursuant to the terms of the note and deed; (4) lack of standing; (5) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (6) lack of personal jurisdiction; (7) lack of subject matter jurisdiction in that no properly constituted entity owns and holds the [n]ote and/or [m]ortgage in question; and/or that any purported assignment or transfer thereof is ineffective and unenforceable; (8) lack of subject matter jurisdiction in that there is presently no proper party [p]laintiff before the [c]ourt, or if so, said party is not the legal owner of the [n]ote and [m]ortgage; and (9) defectiveness, unenforceability and/or prematurity of the Bank's action as a result of the foregoing special defenses. In support of its motion, the Bank submits the following evidence: (1) an affidavit of John Cook, a title searcher; (2) an affidavit of Tonya Hopkins, an assistant secretary for American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., the Bank's loan servicer; (3) a copy of the subject note and mortgage;2 (4) copies of the mortgage assignments to Taylor and the Bank, respectively; (5) a copy of a default notice letter addressed to Donofrio; (6) an affidavit of David Borrino, an attorney for the Bank; and (7) copies of United States postal service shipment tracking documentation. %PDF-1.4 We are thus being asked to pass on a contention raising constitutional questions, governed by a Supreme Court decision that has been puzzling to commentators12 and to courts,13 which demand careful scrutiny of a trial record and instructions which do not exist. WebDahill A Donofrio Jr Dahill A Donofrio Jr, Age 69 aka Donofrio Dahill, Dahill D Onofrio Current Address: LZDM Greystone, Shelton, CT Past Addresses: Bridgeport CT, Shelton Share. He served in the West Virginia House of Delegates (from 195761) and in the State Senate (from 196164). Get free summaries of new Second Circuit US Court of Appeals opinions delivered to your inbox! v. Khan, Superior Court, judicial district of Fairfield, Docket No. As said in Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379, 390, 99 S. Ct. 675, 683, 58 L. Ed. The Bank states in its memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment that original or certified copies of these documents will be produced at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment.. 203-378-9125 | Dahill A Donofrio - Stratford, CT See also United States v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers, 352 U.S. 567, 590-92, 77 S. Ct. 529, 540-41, 1 L. Ed. The court has already addressed the issues of standing and subject matter jurisdiction and need not revisit its prior analysis. As of September 5, 2022, Freedom of Information Commission meetings and contested case hearings will resume being conducted in person. The Bank states in its memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment that original or certified copies of these documents will be produced at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment.. Dahill * Historical, vital, and court records and search results may require an additional purchase. Donofrio, 4 Whip and the defendant Connecticut Environmental, LLC, have all appeared in this matter and were properly served with process. endobj Curcio cites no instance where a lower federal court has avowedly disregarded a controlling decision of the Supreme Court, and the only instance that occurs to us is the action of a three-judge court in the second flag salute case, Barnette v. West Virginia State Board of Education, 47 F. Supp. denied, 425 U.S. 960, 96 S. Ct. 1742, 48 L. Ed. In the absence of an evidentiary record we cannot say whether the prosecutor would have been able to invoke Pinkerton. The proceedings were digitally recorded. We found 15 phone numbers and email addresses. The fact that no other court has exclusive jurisdiction in any matter is sufficient to give the Superior Court jurisdiction of that matter [T]he general rule of jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior Court but that which specially appears to be so [N]o court is to be ousted of its jurisdiction by implication. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Uncover Dahill's photos, videos, and more , Personal details for Dahill may include . 684 F.2d at 1073. }7l-dxq|&)M pNA#_gpjH(s8yI&+u-mb'=j@|)27 R`+"S:?fH'YLVDLAMB>ldThB\8#JH)A4w.Q;$?IfN,U&4{%n6"[|eq$`/. (203) 378-.css-1y2reja{color:transparent;position:relative;z-index:12;text-shadow:0.1rem 0.1rem 0.6rem #089FE4;}HOUE. 4 Whip argues that the affidavit does not contain an oath or attestation, nor was the affidavit properly notarized. The prosecutor, evidently to comply with F.R.Cr.P. Instead the Court held that " [a]s long as it is clear that the presumption is not the sole and sufficient basis for a finding of guilt", it need meet only a "more likely than not" rather than a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and, after analyzing the precise facts and jury instructions in Allen, concluded that the New York statute passed the test as there applied. The conclusion that a statute is too vague and therefore void as a matter of due process is thus unlikely to be triggered without two findings: that the individual challenging the statute is indeed one of the entrapped innocent, and that it would have been practical for the legislature to draft more precisely. Thus, the sixth special defense does not create an issue of fact as to 4 Whip's liability on the complaint. The Indictment and the Proceedings in the District Court. Unlike the frequent case where the maximum punishment under the general conspiracy section, 18 U.S.C. L. Rev. Defendants should be required promptly to plead guilty or not guilty and, if the latter, to proceed to an early trial. The issue of standing implicates subject matter jurisdiction [I]t is the burden of the party who seeks the exercise of jurisdiction in his favor clearly to allege facts demonstrating that he is a proper party to invoke judicial resolution of the dispute. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dahill Donofrio - Class of 1972 Alumni - Bunnell High School 682 (Supp. FN1. This extra-record evidence reflected that Success, Inc., had commenced the prior action shortly after the defen The complaint in this matter has been withdrawn. Dahill has lived with Santa in a single family house in Stratford, CT. Search for birth, death, marriage, divorce, US Census, and military records. Dahill Donofrio - Retired - Millennium group mgmt | LinkedIn Kakadelis v. DeFabritis, 191 Conn. 276, 282, 464 A.2d 57 (1983). The Allen majority criticized this court for having passed on the constitutionality of a "permissive presumption" statute, to wit, a New York statute providing that presence of a firearm in an automobile is presumptive evidence of its possession by all occupants, "on its face", 442 U.S. at 162-63, 99 S. Ct. at 2227-28. The present foreclosure action was filed with the court on January 26, 2009. Here is Dahill's phone number (203) 929-6629 (Southern New England Tel Co). By virtue of a quit claim deed dated and recorded on November 17, 2006, Donofrio transferred an interest in the subject property to 4 Whip. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. The void-for-vagueness claim, read as we believe it must be, can be determined by analysis of the statute and, if appellants are right, would prevent them or anyone else from being convicted under it. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. 1978). 1269 xVM6+@wrV%m*-!w$?8aU#~a@!O/r8^%G}[P ` 371 (fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than five years or both) is less than for the substantive crime, 18 U.S.C. Not only does 892(b) specifically declare that "this subsection is nonexclusive", but the legislative history recognizes that "it may be unnecessary for the prosecution to make use of sections 892(b) and 892(c)". (3) At the time the extension of credit was made, the debtor reasonably believed that either, (A) one or more extensions of credit by the creditor had been collected or attempted to be collected by extortionate means, or the nonrepayment thereof had been punished by extortionate means; or. 1975); United States v. Molina, 581 F.2d 56, 60 (2 Cir. Viewing the available evidence in a light most favorable to 4 Whip, the Bank has established a prima facie case of mortgage foreclosure and 4 Whip's special defenses are insufficient to withstand the entry of summary judgment. 1265, 1285-86 (1978). He is a male registered to vote in Connecticut. The prosecutor also said that the Government's evidence would establish that Gus Curcio was "second in command of the extortion conspiracy with supervisory responsibility, that Dahill D'Onofrio acted as principal collector of the loans, and that defendants D'Onofrio, Vagnini and Garcia extended and collected loans under the supervision and control of the Curcio brothers", and that the evidence would show that none of the debts would have been legally enforceable in Connecticut. 154, 157, 687 A.2d 1309, cert. The mortgage deed was recorded in the Stratford land records. 1877 (1947), an appeal from the dismissal of an indictment under the Criminal Appeals Act as it then stood, 18 U.S.C. Appellants' proposal that we determine the validity of 892(b) apart from an evidentiary record and jury instructions invites the very "on its face" consideration of constitutionality which the Allen majority condemned. Thus, 4 Whip was made a party to this action due to its status as a subsequent interest holder. This was among the amendments to the Rules of Criminal Procedure transmitted by the Chief Justice to Congress pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Dahill resides with Nona in Shelton, CT in a condominium. The district judge abused his discretion in accepting a plea permitting such a question to be put to us.14 Compare Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey, 351 U.S. 427, 437, 76 S. Ct. 895, 900, 100 L. Ed. 564, 577-85 (1980). The plea agreements with the other defendants were similar except that Gus Curcio and D'Onofrio were to plead guilty to Count Two and Garcia to Count One; that the recommended sentences were to be four years for D'Onofrio and one year for Garcia; and that Exhibit A attached to each agreement was limited to the first two questions listed in Exhibit A to the agreement with Francis Curcio and the representation by the United States was limited to its need to utilize 18 U.S.C. Robert Cushman appeared on his own behalf. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame and received his law degree from West Virginia University College of Law. q&.ao@*\u\kpwcOvn!s?P]q QZ$#:1\!3(c =X"uoOVnq>v\,2v)8u-2ygy5-'g*N4l]ZEiFIb&JF-aO>-dz=|Mf3?$Y%H!^omT |Zlz-['bs[YAR"_v>wKTMTJT whu Q$/@$;&A}nYiu! cg ESG*Kn@:a.@.QK%m=8G#n.F+%#HC$I.!N()R`H'VNmT?H1xiZ20vS)P}A#Pfoy*Ynl'8M; M Dahill A Donofrio from Stratford, Connecticut L. Rev. Angelo Joseph D'onofrio (age 95) is listed at 487 Commanche Lane A Stratford, Ct 06614 and is affiliated with the Republican Party. Main: 203-348-7410. No votes were taken. Co. of Pennsylvania, 231 Conn. 756, 796, 653 A.2d 122 (1995). The United States represents that if the case were to proceed to trial it would be necessary to utilize both the provisions of 18 U.S.C. JxvleD;lCpfVpY;7tlc0oP ` Vkm72hONyl[CWg7L#%QRovQ8667n,*R2Yir4l.-XtZZLV dTC+QK1@Tn x`{4(D443\AS5l_t FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. The three-judge court explained the unusual course there taken on the basis that four of the seven Justices who had participated in the first flag salute case, Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586, 60 S. Ct. 1010, 84 L. Ed. Dr. D'Onofrio resides in Stamford with his wife, has six children (two sets of twins!) Count Two charged the Curcios, D'Onofrio and Vagnini with an extortionate extension of credit to John Acabbo; Count Three charged Francis Curcio and Vagnini with such an extension of credit to Richard Alchimio; Count Four charged the Curcios and D'Onofrio with such an extension of credit to Ronald Benedetto; Count Five charged them with such an extension of credit to Norman Ellsworth; Count Six charged them with such an extension to Darryl Hardiman; and Count Seven charged them with such an extension to Donald Brutnell. Includes Address (5) Phone (4) See Results. Professor Saltzburg, disagreeing with much of Professor Westen's analysis, would nevertheless accept his formulation of the decisions if it were reworded to read: A defendant who has been convicted on a plea of guilty and who has complied with pre-plea procedural rules regarding notice of constitutional claims may challenge his conviction on any constitutional ground that, if asserted before trial, would forever preclude the state from obtaining a valid conviction against him on the charge to which he pleaded, regardless of how much the state might endeavor to correct the defect. 6 0 obj [1], Dahill died in Huntington, West Virginia, aged 93.[2]. Indeed, as pointed out in 1 Weinstein & Berger, Evidence under the United States Rules, p 303, at 303-25 (1982), the novelty of Allen, and the point on which the majority of five and the minority of four divided, was its holding that in determining whether a "permissive presumption" satisfied the rationality test "the proper evidence to scrutinize is not the general experience of the community or the validity of the legislative findings which support the presumption, but rather the evidence submitted in the particular case at issue." The Burns court, speaking through Chief Judge Feinberg, elaborated on our concerns, previously voiced in United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46 (2 Cir. The mandate shall issue forthwith. This need to know the evidence in passing on the constitutionality of a "permissive presumption" is not satisfied by the Government's representation in the plea agreements that "it would be necessary to utilize the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn.App. All parties and witnesses must appear in person for their contested case hearings and Commission meetings. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Goduto, 110 Conn.App. Each meeting will be held in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, First Floor, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut, for the purpose of conducting a hearing concerning the contested case designated by the corresponding docket number listed below. In the first four cases the constitutional claims were held not to survive the guilty plea; in the last two, as in Haynes, supra, 390 U.S. 85, 88 S. Ct. 722, 19 L. Ed. The reason for the sparse discussion of the survival of the constitutional claim is clear. 2d 138 (1968)); McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S. Ct. 1441, 25 L. Ed. Dahill Donofrio in Stratford, CT - Phone, Address, Email & mo For further information concerning these hearings, please contact the Commissions administrative office at 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06106: telephone (860) 566-5682. Dahill and Samuel have resided together in a single family house in Stratford, CT. Dahill resides in Shelton, CT in a condominium with Deborah. Donofrio Dahill Profiles in Bridgeport CT, Fairfield CT, and Stratf Thereafter, Donofrio defaulted on his payments and Taylor elected to accelerate and foreclose the mortgage. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Garcia was the next to plead. Discover work experience, company details, and more. Linda D'Onofrio Click to reveal The proceedings were digitally recorded. 2d 628 (1974) (prosecution's making more serious charge after defendant had exercised right to seek trial de novo in higher court); and Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 96 S. Ct. 241, 46 L. Ed. Stratford, Ct, 06615. In order to obtain a conviction under the substantive Count Three, to which Francis Curcio pleaded, by virtue of the Pinkerton rule, the Government would be obliged to tender evidence that would support a conviction under the conspiracy Count One, to which he was permitted not to plead. ], It has been argued that there is a constitutional right to plead conditionally guilty, at least in states in which defendants have the option to plead unconditionally guilty. 1489 (1946), allowing a conspirator to be held liable for reasonably foreseeable substantive offenses of another conspirator in furtherance of the conspiracy, was unconstitutional. Performance & security by Cloudflare. On the other side, the prosecution indicated that the proffered evidence was not all that it had available. There are 4 court records for "Dahill Donofrio" in "Fairfield County". The Court added, 439 U.S. at 391, 99 S. Ct. at 683: This appears to be especially true where the uncertainty induced by the statute threatens to inhibit the exercise of constitutionally protected rights. May v. Coffey, 291 Conn. 106, 113, 967 A.2d 495 (2009). Family Medicine. FN2. Also known as Leonard J D'Onofrio, Leonard Onfrio, Leonard Donotrio, Lenny D Onofrio. 2d 785 (1970) (guilty plea under statutes whereby punishment on such a plea would be life imprisonment whereas after jury trial punishment would be death unless jury recommended life imprisonment);9 Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 93 S. Ct. 1602, 36 L. Ed. U.S. Public Defender, New Haven, Conn., for appellant Roberto Garcia. The district court, on December 9, 1982, entered an order approving the defendants' reservation for appeal to this court of the issues described in Exhibit A to their respective plea agreements. The Freedom of Information Commission will hold special meetings during the week of March 3, 2014 through March 7, 2014 at the specific dates and times listed below. Attorney Ryan W. Zaziri appeared on behalf of the respondents. Much space is devoted to arguments concerning the degree of the Government's responsibility for the publicity, with the Government responding that most of the material could have been found in public sources, such as Judge Zampano's statements sentencing Francis Curcio for a similar crime in 1977, a memorandum of Judge Burns revoking his probation in 1980, and an answer filed by the Government on September 15, 1981, in an unrelated case. Defendants moved to dismiss the indictment on the grounds, among others, (1) that 18 U.S.C. At a trial the Government could well have decided to drop the substantive counts against Francis; additional fines were all it could gain from convictions under them, as distinguished from the one under the conspiracy count which it had to prove in any event. See also Amsterdam, The Void for Vagueness Doctrine in the Supreme Court, 109 U. Pa. L. Rev. regular WebCompany Description: Global Operations Texas (doing business as Dahill) makes sure everyone in Texas gets a copy. Before the argument of the appeal the court advised counsel by letter that they "should be prepared to address at oral argument the question whether, in view of United States v. Burns, 684 F.2d 1066 (2 Cir. 1489 (1946), on which the prosecutor represented he would be obliged to rely, should be overruled. 4Whip objects to the motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the Hopkins affidavit is defective and that material issues of fact exist precluding entry of judgment as to liability. 892(b) and made no reference to Pinkerton v. United States, supra, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S. Ct. 1180, 90 L. Ed. denied, 262 Conn. 937, 815 A.2d 163 (2003). Your IP: Hand made exotic belts and bags. See also Lefkowitz v. Newsome, 420 U.S. 283, 95 S. Ct. 886, 43 L. Ed. Your IP: No votes were taken. 2d 777 (1979). The hearing convened at 11:09 AM, with Hearing Officer, Tracie C. Brown presiding. The court will consider the Hopkins affidavit attached to the Bank's reply memorandum in place of the original Hopkins affidavit attached to the motion for summary judgment in resolving this matter. The officially released date that appear - jud.ct.gov WebAngelo is on the list of graduates from high school. 1397, 90th Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in 1968 U.S.Code Cong. Haynes is far from being the Supreme Court's latest word on the issue how far constitutional claims survive an unconditional plea. The prosecutor made substantially the same proffer with respect to the Acabbo loans that he had made before, and added that "the Government would further prove through other evidence and testimony at the trial a systematic extension of loans and collection of interest payments by the defendant D'Onofrio from at least four debtors in addition to John Acabbo". Later, on December 3, 1982, he denied motions of the Curcios for reconsideration of his ruling with respect to pretrial publicity. In addition to what has been recounted above, the prosecutor said that Acabbo would testify that at the time when the extensions of credit were made, he believed that the Curcios had reputations for the use of threats and violence in the collection of loans. hamilton police auxiliary An evidentiary hearing of the Freedom of Information Commission in the following matter was held on March 4, 2014 in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut. 54(b)); Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co., 351 U.S. 445, 452-53, 76 S. Ct. 904, 908-909, 100 L. Ed. 4 Whip has not raised a genuine issue of material fact with regard to its special defenses concerning the court's subject matter jurisdiction over the present action. hamilton police auxiliary Although appellants characterize 892(b) as a "presumption", it certainly is not a "mandatory presumption", namely, a rule that "tells the trier that he or they must find the elemental fact upon proof of the basic fact, at least unless the defendant has come forward with some evidence to rebut the presumed connection between the two facts." Dahill departed this 2 bed / 3 bath condo in 2005. ), aff'd, 67 Conn.App. It will be time enough for the Court to reconsider Pinkerton, if it desires to do so, in a case where it has a full record and application of the rule would make some substantial difference. When a complaint and supporting affidavits establish an undisputed prima facie case for a foreclosure action, a court must only determine whether [a] special defense is legally sufficient before granting summary judgment. LaSalle National Bank v. Shook, Superior Court, judicial district of New London, Docket No. We likewise do not see how a full trial could bring appellants' claim regarding pretrial publicity, in part allegedly the result of prosecutorial misconduct, into sharper focus.

Is Barry Du Bois Still Married, News Channel 10 Sports Amarillo Tx, Northcliff Kidnapping Suspect, Ferriday, La Arrests, List Of Fort Hood Commanders, Articles D